Cases 11 - 20 of 4,726
Dillard v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04396
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Dillard, II
Defendant:
City of Chicago, CW Martin, Jr and M K Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patrick v. Spradley et al
as 1:2024cv04377
Plaintiff:
Kiyan Patrick
Defendant:
Ernest Spradley, Jake Schmeisser, Ravyn Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKenzie v. Ferrantella et al
as 1:2024cv04353
Plaintiff:
Charles McKenzie
Defendant:
P.O. Ferrantella, P.O. Piskorek and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mathis v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04278
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Mathis
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, R. Collins, M. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Streeter et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04158
Plaintiff:
Jovan Streeter and Marquita Beecham
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Kenneth Sunde, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kacar v. City of Skokie et al
as 1:2024cv03894
Plaintiff:
Faruk Kacar
Defendant:
City of Skokie, City Of Chicago and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Higgs v. Urbanski et al
as 1:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Jayden Higgs
Defendant:
Raymond Urbanski, Roger Farias, Gabriel Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roberts
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
