Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
April Ortiz, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 10-1775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
APRIL ORTIZ, on her own behalf and as Administrator for the ESTATES OF MAY MOLINA and MICHAEL ORTIZ, Deceased and SHANNON GUZMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, UNKNOWN CHICAGO POLICE OFFICERS, THOMAS GAYNOR and others
April Ortiz, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 10-1621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
APRIL ORTIZ, on her own behalf and as Administrator for the ESTATE OF MAY MOLINA, deceased, MICHAEL ORTIZ and SHANNON GUZMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, UNKNOWN CHICAGO POLICE OFFICERS, THOMAS GAYNOR and others
James Dahm v. Sergio Molina, et al
as 09-3253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. DAHM
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGIO MOLINA, Assistant Executive Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, JOHN CEARLOCK, Retired, Health Care Administrator, Graham Correctional Center, ADRIAN FEINERMAN, Medical Director, Menard Correctional Center and others
Malone v. Zuercher et al
as 1:2009cv01257
Plaintiff:
Vernado Malone, Sr and Vernado Malone, Sr
Defendant:
Jerome C Zuercher, Michael Nalley, Scott Moats and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matrisciano et al v. Madigan et al
as 1:2008cv02419
Plaintiff:
Ronald Matrisciano
Defendant:
Lisa Madigan, Mark Ross, Joseph Ponsetto and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilkerson v. Lopez et al
as 1:2008cv01960
Plaintiff:
Jerome Wilkerson, Jerome Wilkerson, Jerome Wilkerson and others
Defendant:
R. Lopez, Molina and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Watson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv00519
Plaintiff:
Deandre Watson and Deandre Watson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, D Williams and J. Molina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
