Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rodriguez v. County of Cook et al
as 1:2010cv04207
Plaintiff:
Angel Rodriguez
Defendant:
County of Cook, Office of Cook County State's Attorney, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins et al v. Ostrowski
as 2:2010cv02095
Plaintiff:
Dustin Collins , Lawrence Moye , Debra Blanchard and others
Defendant:
Thomas Ostrowski
Petitioner:
Ernesto Perez and Deborah Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver et al v. Triton College et al
as 1:2009cv05233
Plaintiff:
Ann D. Weaver and Cassandra R. Weaver
Defendant:
Triton College, Patricia Granados, Cathy Andress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hughes v. Weaver et al
as 1:2009cv04942
Defendant:
The Board of Education of the Argo Community High School District 217, Frank Stout, Kevin O'Mara and others
Plaintiff:
Daphne Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
