Cases 31 - 40 of 154
Morris et al v. City of Rockford et al
as 1:2020cv05933
Plaintiff:
Terrance Morris and Darnisha Morris
Defendant:
City of Rockford, J. Carder, Pop Warner Sports League and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Daniel Morris v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2020cv50320
Defendant:
Chad Williamson, Michael Ahrens, S. Hoffman and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Daniel Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Highland Park CVS, LLC d/b/a CVS Pharmacy Store #8747 et al
as 1:2020cv04060
Defendant:
Morry Matson, Highland Park CVS, LLC d/b/a CVS Pharmacy Store #8747 and John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Camilla Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Libertarian Party of Illinois et al v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2020cv02112
Defendant:
William R Haine, laura donahue, Ian Linnabary and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Whitney, bennett morriss, Libertarian Party of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv50089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchison v. David Morris et al
as 3:2019cv00985
Plaintiff:
Joseph Don Hutchison
Defendant:
City of Harrisburg IL and David Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cherrone v. City of Morris et al
as 1:2018cv08505
Plaintiff:
Douglas Dean Cherrone
Defendant:
City of Morris, Tristan Borzick, Monty Allbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01322
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
