Cases 31 - 40 of 1,739
Benitez v. Bogucki et al
as 1:2023cv16896
Plaintiff:
Francisco Benitez
Defendant:
Jerome Bogucki, Raymond Schalk, Paul Zacharias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stuckey v. Roberson et al
as 1:2023cv16882
Plaintiff:
Jamiah Stuckey
Defendant:
Officer Reginald Roberson and County of Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colon v. Noradin et al
as 1:2023cv16798
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Colon
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Petitioner:
Tyrone Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clay v. Noradin, et al
as 1:2023cv16799
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Clay
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnston v. AMT of Central IL et al
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
AMT of Central IL, Peoria Fire Department, Bloomington-Normal Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
