Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Plummer v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv08253
Plaintiff:
Edward Plummer
Defendant:
S. A. Godinez, Howard A Peters, Odie Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales et al v. Monreal et al
as 1:2013cv07572
Plaintiff:
Moises Morales , Montreal Thomas and Joaquin Rocha
Defendant:
Adam Monreal , S.A. Godinez and Pat Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stellwagen et al v. Quinn et al
as 1:2013cv07401
Plaintiff:
Ava Diaz Stellwagen and William Stellwagen
Defendant:
Pat Quinn, Salvador A. Godinez and Nedra Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Saddler et al
as 1:2013cv04984
Plaintiff:
David Poole
Defendant:
Michelle R.B. Saddler, S. A. Godinez, Stephen L. Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sherrod, Jr. v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv04141
Plaintiff:
Ap. William T. Sherrod, Jr.
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Ona Welch, Nedra R. Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv02888
Plaintiff:
Joel Jackson
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez , Michael P. Randle, Richard Birkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02758
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hunter v. Sood et al
as 1:2013cv02569
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hunter
Defendant:
Kul Sood, S.A. Godinez, Roberta Fews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weed v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv05703
Plaintiff:
Karen Weed
Defendant:
Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Jean-Claude Brizard, Office of the Sheriff of Cook County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fontano v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv03042
Plaintiff:
James Fontano
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Alex Dawson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
