Cases 31 - 40 of 719
Holmes v. Sight et al
as 1:2023cv17013
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Holmes
Defendant:
Latilda Sight, Aaron Pennix, University of Chicago Woodlawn Charter School and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Discrimination in Federally-Funded Education Program
Parekh v. DePaul University
as 1:2023cv16294
Plaintiff:
Dr. Bharat Parekh
Defendant:
DePaul University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
de Lanerolle v. Board of Trustees of the Illinois State Universities Retirement System et al
as 2:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
Primal de Lanerolle
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of the Illinois State Universities Retirement System, Collin Van Meter, Andriy Bodnaruk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Coffee v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv17111
Plaintiff:
Sonia Coffee
Defendant:
Deborah Wilson and Village of University Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
