Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Smith v. Decatur Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv02083
Plaintiff:
Adam Smith
Defendant:
Decatur Police Department, . Hughes, . Waggoner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Collier v. John Caraway, et al
as 18-1077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. COLLIER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN F. CARAWAY, Warden, LEANN LARIVA, CHRISTINA DESMITH and others
Sylvester Jackson v. Jon Litscher, et al
as 18-1062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYLVESTER JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JON E. LITSCHER, MICHAEL A. DITTMANN, Warden, TAMMY MAASSEN, Health Service Manager and others
Ellis v. Pfister et al
as 1:2017cv01254
Defendant:
Randy Pfister , James Boland , Officer Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupree et al v. Locke et al
as 1:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
Donna Dupree and SHERRY HARTISON
Defendant:
Angela Locke, Clara Sharon, Linne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Smith v. Kevwe Akpore, et al
as 16-3608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVWE AKPORE, Warden, JAMES M. CAROTHERS, Correectional Officer, STEPHEN DAMEWOOD, Correctional Officer and others
Ellis v. Pfister et al
as 1:2016cv09449
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, James Boland , Officer Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedric Dupree v. Marcus Hardy, et al
as 16-2212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC DUPREE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCUS HARDY, Warden, RANDY PFISTER, WAYNE GERMAINE and others
Darwin Ramirez v. Warden, et al
as 15-3298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARWIN RAMIREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD YOUNG, Warden, individually, TARRY WILLIAMS, Warden, individually, JEFF KORTE, Warden, individually and in his official capacity and others
Uppal v. Welch et al
as 1:2015cv08077
Plaintiff:
Prabhjot Uppal
Defendant:
K. Michael Welch, Gail L. Warden, Marc Abel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
