Cases 51 - 60 of 122
Celio et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv04707
Defendant:
Officer Zeneke, Sgt. Sanchez, CITY OF CHICAGO CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Quesada, Judith Celio, Nya Celio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denzel Franklin v. Deputy Sheriff D. Poindexter et al
as 1:2018cv04015
Plaintiff:
Denzel Franklin
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff D. Poindexter, Deputy Sheriff J. Voight, Deputy Sheriff Warniczek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv02603
Defendant:
Fernando Velez, T Horton, Patrick Keating and others
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Nadzhafaliyev et al v. Hardy et al
as 1:2017cv04469
Plaintiff:
Ali Nadzhafaliyev, Sean Gunderson, Paul Olsson and others
Defendant:
Daniel Hardy, Coleen Delaney, Brian Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Dettman et al
as 1:2016cv08665
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Sanchez
Defendant:
Officer B. Dettman , Officer E. Ely and Donald Enloe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cmiel et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv05297
Plaintiff:
Theresa Cmiel and Cesar Carrizales
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, A. Yanez, G. Guzman-Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
