Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bengston, Mitchell v. Carlson, Christen et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Mitchell E. Bengston
Defendant:
Christen A. Carlson, Eric P. Carlson, Peter Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ruffolo, Ralph et al v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources et al
as 3:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Ralph Ruffolo and Mary Ruffolo
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Adam Payne and Josh Kaul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
State of Wisconsin, Department of Natural Resource v. John Kanerva
as 23-2608
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES and WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN R. KANERVA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
