Civil Rights Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01171
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01793
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chicago Joe's Tea Room, LLC, et al v. Village of Broadview, et al
as 22-3194
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHICAGO JOE'S TEA ROOM, LLC and PERVIS CONWAY, individually
Defendant / Appellee: VILLAGE OF BROADVIEW, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, HENRY VICENIK, FITZGERALD MULLINS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01374
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Chicago Joe's Tea Room, LLC, et al v. Village of Broadview, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1989
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHICAGO JOE'S TEA ROOM, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company and PERVIS CONWAY, individually
Defendant - Appellee: VILLAGE OF BROADVIEW, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, HENRY VICENIK, FITZGERALD MULLINS and others
Magnolia Spice Teas, Inc. et al v. Dickl et al
as 1:2012cv06761
Plaintiff: Magnolia Spice Teas, Inc. and Calvita J Fredrick-Sowell
Defendant: John Dickl, Knox County Purchasing Division, US Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Chicago Joe's Tea Room, LLC et al v. The Village of Broadview, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv02680
Plaintiff: Chicago Joe's Tea Room, LLC and Pervis Conway
Defendant: Village of Broadview, The, Henry Vicenik, Fitzgerald Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?