Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jaile v. City of El Paso et al
as 1:2024cv02339
Plaintiff:
Carlos Jaile
Defendant:
City of El Paso, Lilia Beard, Paul Blott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Gomez v. El-Milagro, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01606
Plaintiff:
Baldomero Bulmaro De Paz Gomez
Defendant:
El-Milagro, Inc.. and El-Milagro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Reeves , III v. Scott et al
as 1:2022cv05799
Plaintiff:
TURNER, REEVES III and Turner Reeves, III
Defendant:
LT. SCOTT, SGT. SULLIVAN, COUNSELOR T. SHERMAN and others
Intervenor:
C. NORRIS LAW GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. El-Milagro, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01852
Plaintiff:
Alma Sanchez
Defendant:
El-Milagro, Inc. and El-Milagro, Inc. doing business as El Milagro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Al v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
El Ro Al
Defendant:
The City of Chicago and Joseph Bennett (#19733)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mendoza v. El Taconazo La Fiesta et al
as 1:2021cv06872
Plaintiff:
Josefina Heras Mendoza and Giovanni Arceo
Defendant:
El Taconazo La Fiesta, Alfredo Arceo, Rodolfo Arceo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
El v. Matingly et al
as 1:2021cv01327
Plaintiff:
Nizza P El
Defendant:
Pat Matingly and Maureen Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
