Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Shawn Eagan v. Michael Dempsey, et al
as 17-3184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN EAGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL DEMPSEY, Doctor, AMY MOORHOUSE, JAMES BERRY and others
Reyes v. Fishel et al
as 3:2017cv03192
Plaintiff:
Mario Reyes
Defendant:
Fishel, Henricks, Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McWilliams v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01096
Plaintiff:
Rahim McWilliams
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Roberta Fews, Wendy Wavarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Dempsey et al
as 2:2017cv02010
Plaintiff:
Larry G. Harris
Defendant:
Dempsey, Mary Miller, Richard Lochard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manzanales v. Illinois Deptarment of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01299
Plaintiff:
Pedro Manzanales, Jr
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Pontiac Correctional Center, Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Tilden et al
as 1:2015cv01224
Plaintiff:
Wynston Day
Defendant:
. Tilden, Melvin Hinton, Michael Dempsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eagan v. Dempsey et al
as 1:2015cv01149
Plaintiff:
Shawn Eagan
Defendant:
Dempsey, Moorehouse, Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manzanales v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01103
Plaintiff:
Pedro Manzanales, Jr
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Pontiac Correctional Center, Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. State Of Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv02018
Plaintiff:
Eric Keith McKinney
Defendant:
State Of Illinois, Patrick Quinn, Bruce Rauner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields, Mafayette v. Achtenberg et al
as 3:2014cv00855
Plaintiff:
Mafayette Fields
Defendant:
Achtenberg , Schumann , Cannenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
