Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Davis v. Moroney et al
as 1:2013cv01462
Plaintiff: Michael . Davis
Defendant: Donald Moroney, Kimberly Kelley, S Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Acevedo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02323
Petitioner: Michael . Davis
Respondent: Gerardo Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Acevedo
as 1:2011cv01296
Petitioner: Michael . Davis
Respondent: Gerardo Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis
as 1:2010cv06197
Plaintiff: Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Mulch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00112
Petitioner: Jamon Michael Davis
Respondent: Roger Mulch, Len Mariner and Jefferson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Mulch et al
as 1:2009cv08003
Plaintiff: Jamon Michael Davis
Defendant: Roger Mulch, Len Mariner and Jefferson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Jones et al
as 1:2009cv01345
Plaintiff: Michael . Davis
Defendant: Eddie Jones, David A Lingle, Lance R Tinsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Randle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv05538
Petitioner: Michael Davis
Respondent: Michael Randle and Jorge Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Randle et al
as 2:2009cv02216
Petitioner: Michael . Davis
Respondent: Michael Randle and Jorge Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey et al v. Randle et al
as 2:2009cv02181
Plaintiff: De'Markus Bailey and Michael . Davis
Defendant: Michael Randle and Roger E Walker, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?