Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Spurlin v. Director for the North Central Region for the Fedral Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2021cv50055
Respondent:
(fnu) (lnu) and Director for the North Central Region for the Fedral Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Jacob R. Spurlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prison North Central Regional Office Regional Prea Coordinator et al
as 1:2020cv03522
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison North Central Regional Office Regional Prea Coordinator, Metropolitan Correctional Center, Assist Warden at the Metropolitan Correctioanl Center and others
Plaintiff:
Otho Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. North Chicago Police et al
as 1:2020cv02819
Defendant:
Bryan Antonelli, Magistrate Mason, Bop and others
Plaintiff:
Shariff Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roman v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2020cv01173
Defendant:
Adrian Corley, Downie Drysdale, A Wild and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Roman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Betson v. Suprunowski
as 1:2020cv01147
Plaintiff:
Anthony Betson
Defendant:
Colin Suprunowski and North Pekin Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. North et al
as 1:2020cv01070
Defendant:
Dustin Baylor, Troy North and Nicholas Nall
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. AUSP-Thomson et al
as 3:2020cv50059
Defendant:
Medical Dept., B. Willmirth, Mailroom-R+D Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon DeShaun Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2019cv01397
Defendant:
L Whitecotton, Edmund Lewis, . Vilt and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Molinerio et al
as 1:2020cv01001
Defendant:
. Corley, . Painter, . Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton v. North et al
as 1:2019cv01263
Defendant:
. Wright, Randall Meister and . North
Plaintiff:
Quincy Clifton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
