Cases 191 - 200 of 276
Paul v. The Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv09982
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul
Defendant:
The Bureau of Prisons and McDonald's Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Trudeaux v. Roal et al
as 3:2012cv01061
Petitioner:
David Covington Trudeaux
Respondent:
Wendy J Roal and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phillips v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2012cv01215
Petitioner:
Keith Douglas Phillips
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Murphy v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv03135
Plaintiff:
Maurice Murphy
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , Metropolitan Correctional Center of Chicago , Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moorer-Bey v Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
Stephan Moorer-Bey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Thomas Kane, FBOP Associate Director of Programs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv01462
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dewayne Moore
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Ousley et al
as 3:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
Gary L Smith
Defendant:
H Ousley, B Clayton, M Winklmeier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Familia-Garcia v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2011cv01423
Plaintiff:
Wilson Familia-Garcia
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2011cv00701
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Smith
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snargrass v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2011cv00689
Plaintiff:
Charles Snargrass, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Ronald Riker, Kevin Pigos, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
