Cases 31 - 40 of 144
White v. Hansen et al
as 3:2014cv00841
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
Sharon Hansen, Salvador Godinez, Jesse Mortgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Estrada et al
as 1:2014cv04413
Plaintiff:
Michael Mathis
Defendant:
Manning Estrada, Tom Dart, Daniel Mauricee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson, Jr. et al v. Glover et al
as 3:2014cv50129
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson, Jr. and Paul A. Mathis
Defendant:
Theo Glover, Devlin J. Schoop, Gregory R. James, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mrozek v. Lane et al
as 1:2014cv02568
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Mrozek
Defendant:
Joshua Lane, James Patras, Michael Zolecki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donado v. Randle et al
as 1:2013cv09328
Plaintiff:
Saul Donado
Defendant:
Michael P. Randle, Joseph Mathy, Anna McBee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. French et al
as 1:2013cv01574
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knox
Defendant:
George French, Ms. Mathis, Mr. Torrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Mitchell v. Jesse Montgomery, et al
as 13-3592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY J. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSE MONTGOMERY, Parole Supervisor/Individual and Official Capacity, RANDALL FLEX, Counselor/Individual and Official Capacity and JOSEPH MATHY, Warden, Previous Director/Individual and Official Capacity
Mathis v. Carter et al
as 1:2013cv08024
Plaintiff:
Charles Mathis
Defendant:
Anth Carter, Marcus Hardy, Darryl M Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Ross et al
as 3:2013cv50255
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Mathis
Defendant:
G. Shawn Ross and Office of Professional Standards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Engelsma et al
as 3:2013cv50256
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Mathis
Defendant:
Fernando Engelsma, Kari A. Mason and Alison Meason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
