Cases 41 - 50 of 1,283
Scott v. Wills et al
as 1:2023cv02562
Petitioner:
James Scott
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fonville v. Campbell et al
as 3:2023cv03105
Plaintiff:
Michael Fonville
Defendant:
Jack Campbell, Larry Beck, Bill Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Danville Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02054
Plaintiff:
Martez Johnson
Defendant:
Danville Police Department, Kaitlyn Swisher, Scott Shower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. IDOC et al
as 1:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Lemar Scott
Defendant:
IDOC, Wexford Health Care, Mindi Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. McLean County et al
as 1:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Christiaan David Davis
Defendant:
McLean County, William Yoder, William Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv01015
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott
Defendant:
Lt. Williams, Officer Whitfield, Officer Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisco v. Doe
as 2:2023cv02021
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
Scott Bendix and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brady v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Harley M Brady
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffries, DeeDee Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Artis v. Thornton et al
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Montez Artis
Defendant:
Pimone Thornton, Thomas Scott, David Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milner et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Anthony Milner
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Thomas J. Dart, D. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
