Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,494
Townsend v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2024cv01758
Defendant: John Doe 1, Laresha D. Reed, Mr. Gouche and others
Plaintiff: Joeseph Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2024cv01328
Respondent: Warden, FCI Pekin
Petitioner: James McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kruger v. Hansen et al
as 1:2024cv01332
Defendant: Rodney Alford, Mindi Nurse, Michael George and others
Plaintiff: Joshua W Kruger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Markham Courthouse et al
as 1:2024cv08378
Defendant: Whelan, Thomas Dart, M Brown and others
Plaintiff: Larry James Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Farris v. Danley et al
as 2:2024cv02144
Defendant: Jesse Paul Danley, Kirk Kepley, Chad Schwenke and others
Plaintiff: James Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Ogbuli et al
as 1:2024cv07714
Defendant: Robert Ogbuli and Priscilla Ware
Plaintiff: Joshua James Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv05745
Respondent: Chance Jones and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Petitioner: James E Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50358
Respondent: Brian Lammer
Petitioner: James T Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Lammer
as 1:2024cv07630
Respondent: Warden Brian Lammer
Petitioner: James T Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garcia v. IDOC et al
as 3:2024cv01784
Defendant: Melissa Wise, Mr. Babisch, Lorie Cunningham and others
Plaintiff: Sergio Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?