Cases 1 - 10 of 1,013
Bobby Tatum v. Correctional Officer Hunter, et al
as 24-2088
Plaintiff:
BOBBY TATUM
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUNTER, KARL BRADFORD, sued as Lieutenant Bradford, DARREN GALLOWAY, Warden and others
Ratliff v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01598
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ratliff
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Rob Jeffreys, J. B. Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Reid et al
as 3:2024cv01596
Plaintiff:
Jeryme Morgan
Defendant:
Lt. Reid, C/O Khobe, Warden Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03169
Plaintiff:
Maza Lynch
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes, . Owens, . Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Titus v. Officer Thornton, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
ADAM TITUS
Defendant:
OFFICER THORNTON, Placement Officer, JOHN/JANE DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, WARDEN GOMEZ and others
Tatum v. Criage et al
as 3:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tatum
Defendant:
C/O Criage, Lt. Bradford, Lt Auston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Glover et al
as 3:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Micheal N.B. Attaway
Defendant:
C/O Glover, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Leposky et al
as 3:2024cv01543
Plaintiff:
John U. Singleton
Defendant:
G. Leposky, Lightfoot, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Flowers
Defendant:
Warden Galloway, Sgt. Bernard, C/O Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. John Doe's 1-11 et al
as 3:2024cv50232
Plaintiff:
Sally Coleman
Defendant:
John Doe's 1-11, Jennifer Rold and Courtney Fectz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
