Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Denning v. Illinois State Attorney General et al
as 4:2024cv04130
Defendant:
Al Jean Genevive Denning Thomas, Donna Lea Denning Hartman Talley, Henry County and others
Plaintiff:
Layne Timothy Denning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Hanley et al
as 1:2024cv05352
Defendant:
J. Hanley, Thomas Klein and Kwame Raoul
Plaintiff:
Markus Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Hanley et al
as 3:2024cv50275
Plaintiff:
Markus Buchanan
Defendant:
J. Hanley, Thomas Klein and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold III v. Raoul et al
as 1:2024cv04614
Defendant:
J.B. Pritzker, Bufford, Thomas J. Dart and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Defendant:
The State of Illinois, City Of Dixon, Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Israel Ruiz v. J.B. Pritzker, et al
as 24-1853
Defendant:
EDITH CRIGLER, J.B. PRITZKER, in their official capacities, KWAME RAOUL and others
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL RUIZ
Cisco v. John Doe et al
as 3:2024cv03104
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
John Doe, Office of the Inspector General, Lisa Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hughes et al
as 4:2024cv04063
Plaintiff:
Robbie J Moore
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Tyrone Baker, Wesly Christopherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 1:2024cv02794
Petitioner:
William Johnson
Respondent:
Anthony Wills and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Parker
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Unknown IDOC Directors, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
