Labor Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 121 - 130 of 314
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. T&T ACOUSTICS AND DRYWALL, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00961
Plaintiff: INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant: BARBARA L. KARGER and T&T ACOUSTICS AND DRYWALL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. SCHRAD
as 1:2014cv00920
Plaintiff: INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant: LORI SCHRAD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. MILLWRIGHT INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00914
Defendant: LEONARD BROYLES and MILLWRIGHT INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff: INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. TAYLOR BROS. CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00892
Defendant: DAVID A. DOUP and TAYLOR BROS. CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Plaintiff: INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. TUNK & CO. et al
as 1:2014cv00893
Plaintiff: INDIANA/KENTUCKY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION TRUST FUND and others
Defendant: FRANK TUNK and FRANK F. TUNK & CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. SYCAMORE ENGINEERING, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00891
Defendant: THOMAS T. DINKEL and SYCAMORE ENGINEERING, INC.
Plaintiff: INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. K&M BUILDERS OF JACKSONVILLE, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00852
Defendant: MELINDA ACREE and K&M BUILDERS OF JACKSONVILLE, INC.
Plaintiff: INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. SHUCK CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00615
Plaintiff: INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant: DAVID W. SHUCK and SHUCK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. KANIZER EXCAVATING COMPANY
as 1:2014cv00616
Plaintiff: INDIANA CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP FUND AND JOURNEYMAN UPGRADE PROGRAM, INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and others
Defendant: KANIZER EXCAVATING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
McGriff et al v. 1st American Construction Inc
as 2:2014cv00120
Defendant: 1st American Construction Inc
Plaintiff: Mark McGriff , Doug Robinson , Greg Hauswald and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?