Cases 1 - 10 of 26
CELLA v. LILLY USA LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CELLA
Defendant:
LILLY USA LLC and THE LILLY SEVERANCE PAYMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Potiyevskiy v. Toma, et al.
as 1:2024cv02612
Plaintiff:
ARKADIY POTIYEVSKIY
Defendant:
Lilly Toma and Prymor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
PROBST v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01986
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER M. PROBST
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PROBST v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER M. PROBST
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, DAVID A. RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
PRESTON v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2020cv02978
Plaintiff:
June Preston
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dearmon v. Lilly Dermatology et al
as 1:2020cv02543
Defendant:
Mercy Odueyungbo, Lilly Dermatology, Tony Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Dianne Dearmon
CLARK v. ELI LILLY AND CO.
as 1:2020cv00671
Plaintiff:
Ruth Clark
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Lilly v. United Ground Express Inc.
as 1:2019cv07582
Plaintiff:
Rae Mona Lilly
Defendant:
United Ground Express Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HERR v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv04294
Defendant:
ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH INCORPORATED, ELI LILLY BONUS PLAN, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE HERR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
McWilliams et al v. Papis Wild Horse Inc., d/b/a Wild Horse Bar and Grill et al
as 1:2019cv01667
Plaintiff:
Mia McClintic, Jessica L. Dodge, Tiffany Smith and others
Defendant:
Anthony Christos, Lilly Macciano, Papis Wild Horse Inc., d/b/a Wild Horse Bar and Grill and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
