Cases 101 - 110 of 161
Kelvin Merritt v. Jay Ziegler, et al
as 15-3256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN MERRITT
Defendant - Appellee:
JAY ZIEGLER, listed as Major Zeigler in original complaint but changed pursuant to Order at doc 70, GEORGE HOLTON, listed as Lt. Horton in original complaint but changed pursuant to Order at doc 70, DONALD LINDENBERG, listed as Correctional Officer Lindenberg in original complaint but changed pursuant to Order at doc 70 and others
Esquivel v. Doc Able's Auto Clinic, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08141
Plaintiff:
Jesus Esquivel
Defendant:
Doc Able's Auto Clinic, Inc. and Steve Georgoulio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Riley v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv07130
Plaintiff:
James Riley
Defendant:
Tom Dart and CC DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv07132
Plaintiff:
James Riley
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County Jail and CC DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allenbey v. I.D.O.C., Ill Dept. Of Corr. et al
as 3:2015cv50192
Plaintiff:
Earl Junior Allenbey
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., Ill Dept. Of Corr., S.A. Godinez, Prison State Officials Of I.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv06349
Plaintiff:
Nick Mason
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and C.C. Doc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel v. Merchant et al
as 1:2015cv06174
Plaintiff:
Champakbhai Patel
Defendant:
Hasan Merchant , Sheri B. Merchant , Women's Doc of Elgin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Cook County Doc et al
as 1:2015cv05697
Plaintiff:
Derrick Young
Defendant:
Cook County Doc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young et al v. Cook County DOC
as 1:2015cv05698
Plaintiff:
Derrick Young and Noel Melecio
Defendant:
Cook County DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv05559
Plaintiff:
Dantrell Lloyd
Defendant:
Tom Dart and CC DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
