Cases 111 - 120 of 530
Reyes v. Randle et al
as 3:2009cv01035
Plaintiff:
Antonio G Reyes
Defendant:
Michael P. Randle, Roger E Walker, Donald Hulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ommen Brown v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 09-3810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMMEN BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, GARY CONDOR and others
John Moro v. Angela Winsor, et al
as 09-3778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. MORO
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA WINSOR, REGIE ADAMS, GREGORY LAMBERT and others
LeVail Givens v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 09-3698
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVAIL GIVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., MARCIA KEYS, Marshall, MARVIN COOLEY and others
Allen v. Chandler et al
as 3:2009cv50258
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Allen
Defendant:
Nedra Chandler, Dirk Dusing, Craig O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins-Bey v. Hulick et al
as 3:2009cv00921
Petitioner:
Gregory Collins-Bey
Respondent:
Donald A. Hulick, William P. Spiller, I, Jerry W. Goforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Bush et al
as 1:2009cv01366
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Griffin
Defendant:
George W Bush, Barack Obama, Rod R Blagojevich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing v. Walker et al
as 1:2009cv01368
Petitioner:
David . Ewing
Respondent:
Roger E Walker, Jr and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins-Bey v. Hulick et al
as 1:2009cv06792
Plaintiff:
Gregory Collins-Bey
Defendant:
Donald A. Hulick, William P. Spiller, I, Jerry W. Goforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fabian Santiago v. Deirdre Battaglia, et al
as 09-3630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FABIAN SANTIAGO
Defendant - Appellee:
DEIRDRE BATTAGLIA, ROGER E. WALKER, JR., SHERRY H. BENTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
