Cases 121 - 130 of 180
Kelly v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
Lamonte E Kelly
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Holman v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00240
Plaintiff:
Jason Holman
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Crofoot v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00208
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Crofoot
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eubanks v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Elaine Eubanks
Defendant:
David R Meier , Grand Elk Railroad Co and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dohse v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
Lyle Dohse
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Vest et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00206
Plaintiff:
Donnie J Vest , Richard N Howard , Toby C Chambers and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Dipert v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 1:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dean Dipert
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Mediator:
John W Whiteleather, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osborne v. CSX Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
David Osborne
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2010cv07545
Petitioner:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT
Respondent:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT
as 1:2010cv07425
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
