Cases 11 - 20 of 181
Acevedo v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01073
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Marc D. Smith and Illinois Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Acevedo v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Dominique C Acevedo
Defendant:
Marc D Smith, Kamitha Madkins and Illinois Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo v. Menez
as 1:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Gremlin Menez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Acevedo v. Trent Law Firm et al
as 1:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Trent Law Firm and Marc P. Trent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Romo et al v. Islas Marias Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04378
Plaintiff:
Marcos Romo, Humberto Herrera and Jonathan Acevedo
Defendant:
Islas Marias Restaurant Inc. and Soledad Rodriguez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Gens v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv06535
Plaintiff:
Russell Gens
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Mane Maravic, J. Bartel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv05381
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Acevedo
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bowes-Northern v. Chicago Police Department
as 1:2021cv03351
Defendant:
Lori E. Lightfoot, Chicago Police Department, David Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kuzara v. Drews et al
as 1:2021cv02885
Defendant:
Detective Joseph Gutierrez, Sergeant Abdiel Acevedo, Detective James Marsollais and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis M. Kuzara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
