Cases 11 - 20 of 156
Opitz v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 1:2023cv04868
Plaintiff:
Eric Opitz
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rodriguez, et al v. Oshkosh Corporation et al.
as 3:2023cv00195
Defendant:
Schneider Electric USA, Inc. formerly known as Square D Company, 3M Company, 84 Lumber Company and others
Plaintiff:
Oshkosh Corporation, Kirby Rodriguez and Patricia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Venequip, S.A. v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 22-1463
Petitioner / Appellant:
VENEQUIP, S.A.
Respondent / Appellee:
CATERPILLAR INC.
Caterpillar Inc., as Plan Administrator and fiduciary of the Caterpillar Inc Employee Health, Life and Disability Benefit Program and Caterpillar Inc Retiree Benefit Program v. Baker et al
as 1:2022cv04732
Plaintiff:
Caterpillar Inc., as Plan Administrator and fiduciary of the Caterpillar Inc Employee Health, Life and Disability Benefit Program and Caterpillar Inc Retiree Benefit Program
Defendant:
Jacqueline Baker and Krentz Loran Hodge & Masur PC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Texas Hill Country Landscaping Inc. et al v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00227
Plaintiff:
Morning Star Farms, Northwest Recycling, LLC, Easterling Wood Products Inc. and others
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Venequip, S.A. v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 1:2021cv06297
In Re:
VENEQUIP, S.A.
Respondent:
CATERPILLAR, INC.
Austin v. Caterpillar, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01113
Defendant:
Black & Decker Inc a foreign corporation doing business as Dewalt Industrial Tool Compay and Caterpillar, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bradley Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Navistar Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06143
Intervenor:
Hino Motors Manufacturing, PACCAR Inc., Mitsubishi Fuso Truck of America and others
Defendant:
Navistar Inc. and Navistar International Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
