Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Armour v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv06042
Plaintiff: Charles W Armour
Defendant: Daniel Sullivan, Illinois Department of Corrections (I.D.O.C.), John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Blakley, et al v. Celadon Group, Inc., et al
as 19-1877
Plaintiff / Appellant: KIMBERLY SMITH, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, WILLIAM BLAKLEY, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated and HELEN BLAKLEY, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: CELADON TRUCKING SERVICES, INCORPORATED, QUALITY EQUIPMENT LEASING, LLC, ELEMENT FINANCIAL CORP. and others
Michael McMillan v. Kimberly Smith
as 19-1318
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL D. MCMILLAN
Respondent / Appellee: KIMBERLY SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03259
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv06696
Respondent: Kimberly Smith and Kim Smith
Petitioner: Ernest R Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newton v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv03240
Respondent: Illinois Department of Corrections and Kimberly Smith
Undetermined: Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner: Keith B Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hanks v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01197
Petitioner: Jay A Hanks
Respondent: Kimberly Smith and John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hanks v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv03132
Petitioner: Jay A Hanks
Respondent: Kimberly Smith and John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lamb v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02377
Petitioner: Antoine Lamb
Respondent: Kimberly Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lamb v. Smith
as 3:2018cv03063
Petitioner: Antoine Lamb
Respondent: Kimberly Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?