Cases 11 - 20 of 159
McCoy, Monty v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Monty McCoy
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Al Momani v. Monti et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Petitioner:
Baha'Eddin Al Momani
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dzbik v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Waldemar Dzbik
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Percy Meyers and Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv04041
Plaintiff:
Dana Brown
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Daniel Monti, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Monti et al
as 1:2023cv16541
Petitioner:
Michael Curry
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maxey v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03491
Plaintiff:
LaMarr Maxey
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Alfonso C David, Dr Burrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Thompson v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 23-2782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB JEFFREYS, DANIEL MONTI, A. WALKER and others
Rodriguez v. Monti et al
as 3:2023cv02685
Plaintiff:
Milton Rodriguez
Defendant:
Daniel Monti, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and St Louis University Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
G.L. Wilson Farms, LLC v. Robinson Township et al
as 3:2023cv02347
Plaintiff:
G.L. Wilson Farms, LLC
Defendant:
Robinson Township, Road Commissioner Monty Murray, Robinson Township, Crawford County, Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Yoder v. Robert Prince, et al
as 23-2334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES D. YODER
Defendant / Appellee:
JONATHAN WINTERS, KIM JOHNSON, DANIEL MONTI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
