Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Murillo v. AUSP Thomson/SMU et al
as 3:2023cv50009
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Murillo
Defendant:
AUSP Thomson/SMU, Cruze, Unknown Lieutenant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Larrabee v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50446
Petitioner:
Jonathan Wayne Larrabee
Respondent:
T. Bergami and T. Bergami, Warden, USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Parks v. Fateh Hyder et al
as 3:2022cv50380
Plaintiff:
Freddy Lee Parks
Defendant:
Fateh Fateh Hyder, Justin Yoon, Thomson U.S.P. S.M.U. Federal Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McDonald v. U.S.P. Thomson
as 3:2022cv50276
Plaintiff:
Domonic McDonald
Defendant:
U.S.P. Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNatt v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50277
Petitioner:
Christopher McNatt
Respondent:
Warden, USP Thomson and Thomas Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rivera v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv03545
Plaintiff:
Jasper Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America, FBOP - USP Thomson and DOJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Heaslet v. Warden, U.S.P. Thomson
as 3:2022cv50239
Petitioner:
Michael Clay Heaslet
Respondent:
Warden, U.S.P. Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Baldwin v. Administrative USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv50235
Petitioner:
Reginald Baldwin
Respondent:
Administrative USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Owens v. Warden - U.S.P. Thomson
as 3:2022cv50218
Petitioner:
Lesley Owens
Respondent:
Warden - U.S.P. Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mickling, Sr. v. Waltert et al
as 3:2022cv50168
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Mickling, Sr.
Defendant:
Waltert, Heim, U.S.P. Thomson Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
