Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Berry v. Central Portfolio Control, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv08087
Plaintiff:
Charles Berry
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control, Inc. , Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC , Razor Capital II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Frillman v. Central Portfolio Control, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv06408
Plaintiff:
Terry Frillman
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control, Inc. and Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Von-Driska v. Central Portfolio Control, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Shannon Von-Driska
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HIBLER et al v. CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL, INC.
as 1:2009cv00851
Plaintiff:
SCOTT HIBLER and SHANNON HIBLER
Defendant:
CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Holm v. Central Portfolio Control Inc
as 1:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
Susan Holm
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Penaflor-Grode vs Central Portfolio Control, Inc.
as 1:2008cv06412
Plaintiff:
Lorena Penaflor-Grode and Lorena Penaflor-Grode
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaar v. Central Portfolio Control, Inc.
as 1:2008cv05852
Plaintiff:
Saad W Shaar and Saad W Shaar
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
