Cases 21 - 30 of 159
Schoenhals et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01216
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Monty Schoenhals and Heidi Schoenhals
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brady v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Harley M Brady
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffries, DeeDee Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suane v. Meyers et al
as 3:2022cv02716
Plaintiff:
Remy L Suane
Defendant:
P. Meyers, Wexford Health, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Monti
as 1:2022cv01379
Petitioner:
Michael Hubbard
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tatum v. Hunter et al
as 3:2022cv02411
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tatum
Defendant:
C/O Hunter, Lt. Bradford, Daniel Monti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Lister
as 3:2022cv02059
Plaintiff:
Orlando Perez
Defendant:
C/O Lister and Warden Monti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yoder v. Prince et al
as 3:2022cv02004
Plaintiff:
Charles Douglas Yoder
Defendant:
Prince, Jonathan Winters, Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy, Monty v. Kijakazi, Kilolo
as 3:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Monty McCoy
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hardy v. Monti et al
as 1:2022cv02978
Petitioner:
Chad Harpy and Chad Hardy
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferrell v. Deere & Co
as 3:2022cv50190
Plaintiff:
Monty Ferrell
Defendant:
Deere & Co. doing business as John Deere
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
