Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Frank v. Washington Mutual Bank
as 1:2010cv03663
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Frank
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kimball v. Washington Mutual Bank, Henderson, Navada et al
as 1:2010cv03666
Plaintiff:
Michell Kimball
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank, Henderson, Nevada and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N. A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayes v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
as 1:2010cv03668
Plaintiff:
Daryl Mayes
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and Washington Mutual Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
United States of America v. Liechty et al
as 1:2009cv08041
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Donald Liechty, Monique Liechty and Washington Mutual Home Loans n/k/a JP Morgan Chase
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Knox
as 1:2009cv04672
Plaintiff:
Daniel Knox
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA., as successor by merger to Washington Mutual Bank v. Wildwood Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01068
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA., as successor by merger to Washington Mutual Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA., as successor by merger to Washington Mutual Bank
Defendant:
Wildwood Industries, Inc., Gary K Wilder and Toni Jo Wilder
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv06443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
