Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Bentz v. Maue et al
as 3:2016cv00854
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
Nathaniel Maue, William Qualls, Adam Tope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Donald J. Trump For President, Inc.
as 1:2016cv04676
Plaintiff:
David Roberts
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump For President, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Bentz v. Parthasarathi Ghosh, et al
as 16-1697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
PARTHASARATHI GHOSH, Doctor, CHRISTINE LUCE and JOHN & JANE DOES, #1-#6
David Bentz v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 15-1733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, Chief Administrator of Pontiac Correctional Center, JAMES S. BLACKARD, Major at Pontiac Correctional Center, SUSAN PRENTICE, Lieutenant and others
David Bentz v. Marcus Hardy, et al
as 15-1344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCUS HARDY, Warden, RANDY PFISTER, Assistant Warden, CYNTHIA HARRIS, Counselor and others
Bentz v. Lindenberg et al
as 3:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
Donald Lindenberg, Virgil Smith, Kimberly Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Atchinson et al
as 3:2014cv01132
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
Michael Atchinson, Rick Harrington, Salvidor Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz et al v. Butler et al
as 3:2014cv00996
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz, Brett Sharp, Jesse Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv03272
Plaintiff:
David Robert Crawford
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
David Bentz v. Scott Smith, et al
as 14-2437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SMITH, JOHN ROBBINS, SHERRY LOOS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
