Cases 31 - 40 of 159
Deere & Company Repair Services Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2022cv50188
In Re:
Deere & Company Repair Services Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Forest River Farms, Plum Ridge Farms, Ltd., Daniel Brown doing business as Ostego Forestry Services and others
Defendant:
Deere & Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Reliford v. Monti et al
as 1:2022cv02894
Petitioner:
Timothy Reliford
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akindele v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
Oluwole A. Akindele
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Daniel Monti, M. Bunderin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rode v. Marinez et al
as 3:2022cv00983
Plaintiff:
Dominick Rode
Defendant:
Jasmin Marinez, Joel Fiorentini, Kim Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Simon et al
as 3:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Ricky R Meeks
Defendant:
Lieutenant Simon, Daniel Monti and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoutenborough v. Monti
as 1:2022cv01150
Petitioner:
Scott Stoutenborough
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krueger v. Monti
as 1:2022cv02201
Petitioner:
George Krueger, Jr
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rucker v. Swanson et al
as 3:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
Tony Rucker
Defendant:
Swanson, Jane Doe, Lana Nalewajka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wachter v. Meyers et al
as 3:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Marc Wachter
Defendant:
Dr. Meyers, Jane Doe 1, Lieutenant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Monti et al
as 3:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Warden Monti, L. Walker, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
