Cases 31 - 40 of 345
Akhmetova v. MADSEN et al
as 1:2024cv06565
Defendant:
Director at FBI Christopher Wray, Director at USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou, US Attorney's O Morris Pasqual and others
Plaintiff:
Zhanna Akhmetova
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
MURAD et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv05940
Petitioner:
HADEEL OBAIDI and ILHAM MURAD
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Kenneth Madsen and Ur M Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05651
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05632
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
