Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Hodge v. Pickering et al
as 3:2012cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Roland Hodge
Defendant:
Carl Pickering, Matthew Wise and Becky Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Hagene et al
as 3:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
Keith A. West
Defendant:
E. Hagene, Counseior Lutz, Randy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00795
Plaintiff:
Howard Vaughn , Charlotte Kinney , Betty Shafer and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phillips v. Randle et al
as 3:2010cv01038
Plaintiff:
Eddie Phillips
Defendant:
Michael P. Randle, Sherry Benton, R Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tabb v. Randall et al
as 3:2010cv00479
Plaintiff:
Triandus Tabb
Defendant:
Michael Randall, Sherry Benton, Randy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Walker et al
as 3:2009cv03144
Plaintiff:
Alonje Walton, Sr
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Jr, Hartline, Ron Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Grant v. John Evans, et al
as 09-2097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL LEE GRANT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN EVANS, Warden, JULIUS FLAGG, Assistant Warden, BILL PICKERING, Major and others
Carl Grant v. John Evans, et al
as 09-1908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL LEE GRANT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN EVANS, Warden, JULIUS FLAGG, Assistant Warden, BILL PICKERING, Major and others
Walker v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00670
Plaintiff:
Eric D Walker
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Major Pickering and Daniel L Austin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nordon v. Bartley et al
as 3:2007cv00782
Plaintiff:
Don Nordon
Defendant:
Ken Bartley, Renetta R Hill, Cynthia M Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
