Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Meyer et al v. American Psychiatric Association et al
as 1:2014cv04543
Petitioner:
Eric S. Meyer, Jan Eastgate, Sasha Peters and others
Respondent:
Intel Corp, Advanced Micro Devices, Environmental Protection Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC v. EPA, et al
as 14-1412
Petitioner:
ARCELORMITTAL BURNS HARBOR LLC
Respondent:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY
AmerenEnergy Resources Generat v. EPA, et al
as 13-2959
Petitioner:
AMERENENERGY RESOURCES GENERATING COMPANY
Respondent:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY
Sarah Frey, et al v. EPA, et al
as 13-2142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARAH E. FREY, KEVIN ENRIGHT and PROTECT OUR WOODS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, CAROL M. BROWNER and CBS CORPORATION
Elkinton, Cheryl v. US Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2013cv00166
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A. Elkinton
Defendant:
US Environmental Protection Agency, US Dept Ag, Trade, Consumer Protection and President of US, Cabinet, Chief of Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sierra Club v. EPA, et al
as 12-3404
Petitioner:
SIERRA CLUB
Respondent:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA P. JACKSON
Clean Water Action Council of, et al v. EPA, et al
as 12-3388
Petitioner:
CLEAN WATER ACTION COUNCIL OF NORTHEASTERN WISCONSIN, INCORPORATED and MIDWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA P. JACKSON
Sierra Club v. EPA, et al
as 12-3293
Petitioner:
SIERRA CLUB
Respondent:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA P. JACKSON
Sierra Club v. EPA, et al
as 12-3143
Petitioner:
SIERRA CLUB
Respondent:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA P. JACKSON
Sierra Club v. EPA, et al
as 12-3142
Petitioner:
SIERRA CLUB
Respondent:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA P. JACKSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
