Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Chambliss, Jr. v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv50126
Defendant:
AUSP Thomson Institution, United States of America, K. Maybury and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Chambliss, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doctor v. Thomson USP Illinois
as 3:2021cv50117
Petitioner:
Kareem A. Doctor and Kareem Antwan Doctor
Respondent:
Thomson USP illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fakhouri v. Cioli et al
as 3:2021cv50104
Respondent:
Cioli and USP Thomson Federal Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Samir Fakhouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fakhouri v. Cioli et al
as 1:2021cv01172
Respondent:
Cioli and USP Thomson Federal Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Samir Fakhouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bludgeon Riffola Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv01051
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Cynthia Nicholson, Thank KTM and others
Plaintiff:
Bludgeon Riffola Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Pipps v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50080
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, USP Thomson, J. Gilley and others
Petitioner:
Craig Pipps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. Warden At USP Thomson
as 3:2021cv50051
Respondent:
Warden At USP Thomson
Petitioner:
Robert Ebey Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jean v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50020
Plaintiff:
Johnny Tahja Jean
Defendant:
Warden USP Thomson and Chris Rivers
Respondent:
Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oscar v. USP Thomson
as 3:2021cv50013
Respondent:
USP Thomson
Petitioner:
Jean Oscar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Green v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv50500
Plaintiff:
Andra Green and Juan Mendiola
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Employees at this institution AUSP Thomson, Warden of AUSP Thomson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
