Cases 61 - 70 of 144
McCray v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09841
Plaintiff:
Rudy McCray
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. , Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Curry v. Sood et al
as 4:2016cv04219
Plaintiff:
Torian M Curry
Defendant:
Kul Sood, Lois Lindroff, Rudy Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dexter Rogers v. Rudy Lozano, et al
as 16-3360
Petitioner:
DEXTER ROGERS, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estates of Carrie Bell Rogers and Premius Rogers
Respondent:
RUDY LOZANO and SUSAN L. COLLINS
Party-in-Interest:
NANCY E. BOYER, Judge, STANLEY A. LEVINE, Judge, PARKVIEW HOSPITAL INCORPORATED and others
Rudy-Palos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2016cv04081
Plaintiff:
Robin Rudy-Palos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rudi, Laurie v. Colvin, Carolyn
as 3:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Laurie Ann Rudi
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rowe v. Lauer
as 1:2015cv00250
Plaintiff:
Rudy A Rowe
Defendant:
Don Lauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland et al v. The City of Gary et al
as 2:2015cv00207
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland and The Law Firm of Robert Holland
Defendant:
The City of Gary , Rudy Clay , Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Granados v. 2429 Lincoln Ave Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03902
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Granados
Defendant:
2429 Lincoln Ave Inc. and Rudy Malnati
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Michael Kors, L.L.C. v. Xing
as 1:2015cv01618
Defendant:
Xing, Jiang Su Shi Cheng Yi You Xian Gong Si, MianSen Zheng and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kors, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Mendez v. Mascoutah Il et al
as 3:2015cv00382
Plaintiff:
Rudy Mendez
Defendant:
City of Mascoutah Il, Cody Hawkins, Mascoutah Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
