Cases 71 - 80 of 970
Hubbert v. Jefferies et al
as 3:2023cv50225
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hubbert
Defendant:
Rob Jefferies, Tarry Williams, Dr. Zok and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Bennitt et al
as 1:2023cv03911
Plaintiff:
Nathan Eric Matthews
Defendant:
Lt. Bennitt, Lt. DeSilva, Officer McNeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw, Robert v. Verizon Wireless et al
as 3:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Robert Shaw and Robert Jeffery Shaw
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless, Convergent Outsourcing and McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Henson v. USA
as 2:2023cv02118
Petitioner:
Jeffery T Henson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Steinkamp v. Fayette County Court
as 3:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Steinkamp
Defendant:
Fayette County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. USA
as 2:2023cv02119
Petitioner:
Jeffery T Henson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Weikert v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01691
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S. Weikert
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Van Pelt v. Uraski et al
as 3:2023cv01656
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Van Pelt
Defendant:
Jon M. Uraski, Charles W. Heck, Bradley A. Kirkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Brown et al
as 1:2023cv01180
Plaintiff:
Torlando Dontae McDonald
Defendant:
David Brown and Rob Jefferys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy McCullough v. Jeffery Dennison, et al
as 23-1822
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY MCCULLOUGH
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERY DENNISON, KAREN SMOOT and SHERRY BENTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
