Cases 71 - 80 of 195
James Owens v. Stephen Duncan, et al
as 16-3498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES OWENS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN DUNCAN, Warden, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CHRISTIAN, Lawrence Correctional Center, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BROOKS, Lawrence Correctional Center and others
Courtney v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv01062
Plaintiff:
James Courtney
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Kim Butler, Assistant Warden Lashbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvin T. Perkins, Jr. v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 16-3190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVIN T. PERKINS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, Warden, Stateville Correctional Center and ASSISTANT WARDEN MILES, Assistant Warden of Operations
Cunningham v. IDOC et al
as 3:2016cv00840
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Cunningham
Defendant:
IDOC, S.A. Goinez, Warden Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes v. IDOC et al
as 3:2016cv00826
Plaintiff:
Jairo Reyes
Defendant:
IDOC, Michael P. Atchison, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truly v. Moore et al
as 3:2016cv00783
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Moore, Stephen Duncan, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Plaintiff:
Clark Truly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castile v. Butler et al
as 3:2016cv00444
Plaintiff:
Yaphet Castile
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, C/O Dillingham, C/O Vecht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00277
Plaintiff:
William A Malone
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Thomas A Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wagner v. Godinez et al
as 1:2016cv03020
Plaintiff:
Terry Wagner
Defendant:
SA. Godinez, David Gomez, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. IDOC et al
as 3:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
William A Malone
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Thomas A Spiller, Assistant Warden Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
