Cases 81 - 90 of 161
Roti et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04349
Plaintiff:
Sharon Roti and Michael Roti
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare Worldwide and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2018cv00220
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Martinez
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv03127
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Rogers
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rocio Herrera-Nevarez v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 18-1987
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS E. SPRINGER, in his capacity as trustee of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate of ROCIO HERRERA-NEVAREZ
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Thomas Springer v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 18-1851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS E. SPRINGER, in his capacity as trustee of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate of ROCIO HERRERA-NEVAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
GILMORE v. HOWARD et al
as 1:2018cv00087
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC., THOMAS J. HOWARD and JOHNSON AND JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
JANICE GILMORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hullett et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06914
Plaintiff:
Ann M Hullett and Ronald Hullett
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon US, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beatovic, Curtis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00719
Plaintiff:
Curtis Beatovic
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Morris
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Setser v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv05538
Plaintiff:
Henry Setser
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
