Cases 1 - 10 of 2,365
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund et al v. Oz Directional Drilling, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04697
Plaintiff:
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund, Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund, Operating Engineers Local 150 Apprenticeship Fund and others
Defendant:
Oz Directional Drilling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund et al v. Sewer Rat Underground, LLC
as 1:2024cv02442
Defendant:
Sewar Rat Underground LLC and Sewer Rat Contractors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund, Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund, Operating Engineers Local 150 Apprenticeship Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Employers and Operating Engineers Local 520 Pension Fund et al v. Ehret, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01366
Plaintiff:
Employers and Operating Engineers Local 520 Pension Fund, Mark Johnson, Chad goldschmidt and others
Defendant:
Ehret, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund et al v. D. Spence Excavating, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02351
Plaintiff:
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund, Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Fund, Midwest Operating Engineers Local 150 Apprenticeship Fund and others
Defendant:
D. Spence Excavating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wisconsin Laborers Health Fund et al v. Allstate Concrete Cutting Inc.
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Laborers Health Fund, Wisconsin Laborers Pension Fund, Wisconsin Laborers Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
Allstate Concrete Cutting Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A. - Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund et al v. Apache Industrial United, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02510
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Savings Fund and others
Defendant:
Apache Industrial United, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. INDEPENDENCE CONTRACTING, LLC
as 1:2024cv00805
Plaintiff:
INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant:
INDEPENDENCE CONTRACTING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. MODERNFOLD, INC.
as 1:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant:
MODERNFOLD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Roofers' Pension Fund et al v. Langlois Roofing, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02772
Plaintiff:
Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
Langlois Roofing, Inc. and Ontop Exteriors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE et al v. ROSEMA CORPORATION, AN INDIANA DOMESTIC FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE, BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT PLAN, BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS, INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND, BAC 4 IN/KY APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING PROGRAM, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 4 OF INDIANA & KENTUCKY, and others
Defendant:
ROSEMA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
