Cases 1 - 10 of 5,577
Pearlman v. Tupayachi et al
as 1:2024cv08699
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Elliot Tupayachi
Plaintiff:
Craig Pearlman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv08530
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Mu Bey
Defendant:
Brandon Johnson and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv08527
Defendant:
Nava, City of Chicago and Juarez
Plaintiff:
Douglas D. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08245
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Donaldson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv08001
Plaintiff:
Pedro Donaldson
Defendant:
Officer Mehmedagic, Officer Janowski and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Gillespie v. Boudreau et al
as 1:2024cv08019
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Michael Clancy, Sergio Rajkovich and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myvett v. Chicago Police Officer Daniel Schwartz et al
as 1:2024cv07997
Defendant:
Chicago Police Officer Daniel Schwartz, Unknown Chicago Police Officers and The City of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Paul Myvett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gant v. Rodriguez #17929 et al
as 1:2024cv07953
Defendant:
Ofc. Justin Rodriguez #17929 and City of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Gant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
CONTRERAS v. CITY OF CHICAGO
as 1:2024cv07847
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL CONTRERAS
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liakopoulos v. Welch et al
as 1:2024cv07781
Defendant:
Emmet Welch, ALYSSA JANICKI, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Liakopoulos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
