Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Davis v. Tisza et al
as 1:2022cv02089
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Officer Tisza, Officer John Doe, Lt. Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Transworld Systems, Inc.
as 1:2021cv03070
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Transworld Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Davis v. Harper et al
as 3:2018cv01619
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Joseph Harper and Nancy Vanessa Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Haymen
as 3:2018cv01493
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Haymen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Chester Mental Health Center et al
as 3:2018cv01119
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Chester Mental Health Center, Department of Human Services, Joseph Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Harper et al
as 3:2018cv01118
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Joseph Harper, Stephanie Miller, Jodi Carnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
River Light V, L.P. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv02687
Plaintiff:
River Light V, L.P. and Tory Burch LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", leon herman, Kristen Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Davis v. Lake County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv10764
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Officer Leginza, Officer Keeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Lake County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv10763
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Officer Leginza, Officer Keeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Lake County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv10762
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, "CRT" Leginza, Keeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
