Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa v. Naomi Tillison, et al
as 23-2467
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAD RIVER BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF THE BAD RIVER RESERVATION
Defendant / Appellant:
NAOMI TILLISON
Defendant / Appellee:
ENBRIDGE ENERGY COMPANY, INC. and ENBRIDGE ENERGY, L.P.
Amicus Curiae:
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, NORTH AMERICA'S BUILDING TRADES UNIONS AND UNITED STEELWORKERS, AFL-CIO-CLC, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS and others
Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chipp v. Enbridge Energy Company, Inc., et al
as 23-2309
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BAD RIVER BAND OF THE LAKE SUPERIOR TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF THE BAD RIVER RESERVATION and BAD RIVER BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF THE BAD RIVER RESERVATION
Defendant / Appellant:
ENBRIDGE ENERGY COMPANY, INC. and ENBRIDGE ENERGY, L.P.
Defendant:
NAOMI TILLISON
Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation v. Enbridge Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00602
Plaintiff:
Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation
Defendant:
Enbridge Inc., Enbridge Energy, L.P., Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Heath v. BP Products North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04741
Plaintiff:
Eugene D Heath
Defendant:
BP Products North America, Inc., BP Pipeline (North America) Inc., Enbridge (U.S.) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rakoczy et al v. BP Pipelines (North America) Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
John A Rakoczy , Jean Rakoczy and Nector Machine & Fabricating Inc
Defendant:
BP Pipelines (North America) Inc , BP Corporation North America Inc , BP Amoco Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
