Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Clarence Dace v. Kristina Skeens, et al
as 20-2924
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GARLICK, Psychologist/Committee Member, RANDY PFISTER, KRISTINA SKEENS, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE DACE
Nathaniel Jackson v. Alton Angus, et al
as 19-1736
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL P. MELVIN, JOHN GARLICK, ALTON ANGUS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Clarence Dace v. Kristina Skeens, et al
as 19-1015
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GARLICK, Psychologist/Committee Member, RANDY PFISTER, KRISTINA SKEENS, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE DACE
Taylor v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv01013
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, SA Godinez, . Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Dempse et al
as 1:2017cv01012
Plaintiff:
Kennado Taylor
Defendant:
. Dempse, . Thomas, John Garlick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald Jones v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 16-2270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, GUY PIERCE, JOHN GARLICK, Supervisor Administrator of Mental Health and others
Adams v. Administrative Review Board et al
as 3:2016cv50029
Plaintiff:
John K. Adams
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, Wexford Health Sources, Donald Enloe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Pfister et al
as 1:2016cv01041
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Guy Pierce, John Garlick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Tilden et al
as 1:2015cv01224
Plaintiff:
Wynston Day
Defendant:
. Tilden, Melvin Hinton, Michael Dempsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. McCormick et al
as 1:2015cv01182
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Defendant:
Scott McCormick, Randy Pfister, Guy D Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
