Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv01112
Petitioner:
Keith Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02758
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. United States
as 1:2022cv05860
Plaintiff:
Keith Johnson
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Johnson v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2022pq01758
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00102
Defendant:
Ethicon, LLC, Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Keith Johnson and Jill Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Abbvie, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09579
Plaintiff:
Keith Johnson and Darla Johnson
Defendant:
Abbvie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2016cv04508
Plaintiff:
Eric Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly USA, LLC, Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2015cv11433
Plaintiff:
Timothy Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Tom Dart and Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Family Dollar et al
as 1:2015cv04252
Plaintiff:
Timothy Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Family Dollar and Joel Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company
as 1:2015cv02722
Plaintiff:
Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Illinois Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
